Diagnosis before treatment
Record where, when and how the asphalt is failing.
A pothole, an open crack, a depressed wheel path and a weathered surface do not point to one automatic fix. Start by mapping the affected area. Note whether damage is isolated or repeated, whether it returns after earlier repairs, and whether the surface moves or holds water under vehicle load.
Edges deserve separate attention because they may lack side support or be exposed to repeated wheel loading. Cracks near a garage, drain, utility cut or transition can have different causes than broad surface weathering. Photos taken when the area is wet can reveal low points that disappear on a dry inspection.
- Mark potholes and broken edges.
- Record crack pattern and approximate width.
- Note settlement, heaving or rutting.
- Photograph ponding and runoff paths.
- Identify previous patches or utility cuts.
- List heavy or turning vehicle movements.
Choose by condition
Patching, resurfacing and sealcoating solve different problems.
A localized patch removes and replaces a defined failed area. Resurfacing adds a new asphalt layer over pavement that is considered suitable to remain. Crack treatments address selected openings. Sealcoating is a surface-maintenance treatment; it should not be described as structural repair and cannot correct soft base, settlement or poor drainage.
The important comparison is not which treatment sounds newest. It is whether the proposed treatment matches the observed condition and whether the supporting pavement can carry it. If a quote recommends an overlay or coating, ask what evidence supports leaving the underlying material in place.
Recurring damage
Water and movement can make a surface-only repair temporary.
Mission’s drainage system includes enclosed urban infrastructure and open rural channels. On a private surface, water may also be influenced by downspouts, adjacent grades, ditches, drains and snow or debris accumulation. Standing water does not prove one cause, but it is a reason to review elevations and the drainage path before placing new material.
Repeated cracking or settlement can signal movement below the visible asphalt. The site review should identify whether the defect is limited to the wearing surface or connected to base support, edge loss or drainage. This distinction protects the repair scope from promising more than the selected method can deliver.
Written repair limits
Define the repair boundary and the exclusions.
A repair proposal should identify the location and approximate area, preparation method, material being removed, treatment at edges and tie-ins, disposal and clean-up. It should also state what happens if the exposed material is wet, soft or unsuitable. For resurfacing, ask how existing cracks, drains, curbs and thresholds will be handled.
For sealcoating or crack treatment, ask which defects are appropriate for the material and which will remain visible. Avoid warranty language or life-expectancy claims that are not written, explained and connected to the actual condition of the site.
Before authorization
Use six questions to test the recommendation.
- What failure is the proposed treatment intended to correct?
- What evidence suggests the existing base and pavement can remain?
- How will water move after the repair?
- How are edges, drains, utility cuts and transitions handled?
- Which cracks or surface marks are expected to remain visible?
- What is excluded if wider failure is found after opening the area?
Primary source